« Digital postcards still in future | Main | Home Theatre, DLP TV, TI and the CEA. »

Dodgy Data Rates

Wireless data rates are rarely what they're said to be, and, as wireless moves into the consumer space, the products have to be a lot more straightforward about what they claim to be capable of doing.

The rule of thumb for wireless data-rates is to halve whatever it says on the box.

“If you look at the application layer throughput for 802.11g (WiFi) it’s around 22Mbit/sec, though it’s quoted at 54Mbit/sec”, said Bruce Watkins, president of wireless chip specialist Pulse-Link at a meeting during the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) in Las Vegas.

“For UWB (ultrawideband), the application layer throughput is about 200Mbits/sec when it’s quoted at 480Mbits/sec, and 650Mbits/sec when it’s quoted at 1Gbit/sec,” added Watkins.

I look on the box of an 802.11g router and there, in quite large figures, it says 54Mbits/sec.

For an industry with such an aspiration, its boxes should be honest.

Consumers will not be pacified by a spiel about the difference between the physical layer data rate and the application layer data rate.

They only want to know what data rate they're paying their money for.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.electronicsweekly.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1648

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 18, 2007 7:56 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Digital postcards still in future.

The next post in this blog is Home Theatre, DLP TV, TI and the CEA..

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Sign up for the new weekly Mannerisms eNewsletter. Get the latest posts straight to your email inbox, no fuss. Tick the option for Semiconductor commentary.

RSS Subscribe to this blog's feed
[What is this?]

Recent Comments

Archives

Go back to ElectronicsWeekly.com