« The Dutch TV Repairman And The VC. | Main | How Wrong Can You Be? »

Why Not A $75 Laptop With An ARM CPU?

Maybe Intel’s miserable spat with the OLPC has had some good results, the world is now focussed on low-cost laptops.

Forget the $100 laptop envisaged in the XO laptop design of OLPC, the new goal is the $75 laptop, and it’s being pursued by no less a figure than the former CTO of the OLPC project.

Mary Lou Jepsen has set up a company called Pixel Qi after leaving OLPC last month.

“The XO laptop is perhaps the most innovative laptop made in the last several years. We feel this is just a first step in the transformation of personal computing.”, says a Pixel Qi company statement, “Pixel Qi is currently pursuing the $75 laptop, while also aiming to bring sunlight readable, low-cost and low-power screens into mainstream laptops, cellphones and digital cameras.”

Pixel Qi will give OLPC products at cost, while also selling the sub-systems and devices at a profit for commercial use.

“I believe that looking at computers in a new, holistic, systemic way, with a clean-sheet approach to computer design - rather than incrementally increasing the horsepower of the CPU - is critical to bringing computing and Internet access to more than the 1 billion affluent who now are its beneficiaries”, says Jepsen on the Pixel Qi site, “the key is a new generation of low-cost, low power, durable, networked computers, leveraging open-design principles.”

“A computer is not just its CPU”, says the Pixel Qi site, “ today, we can approach displays as like ASICs, and use this approach to lower the cost of this expensive, power-hungry component. Thus, for the XO, it was essential to simultaneously re-think the computer platform, and to re-think how the display was to be made - along the way becoming the first person to convince a large LCD manufacturer to make an externally-developed design.”

With such an iconoclastic attitude as that, why not use an ARM processor running Linux?

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.electronicsweekly.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/18655

Comments (4)

Rupert Goodwins:

Because most of the internet plug-ins out there, even for Linux, are x86. Not much point surfing the web if you can't get at lots of the content.

Peter Brunning:

There are already quite a few ARM-based smart phones and PDAs out there. If there were also a few billion ARM-based laptops, people might find it worth developing internet plug-ins for devices other than the x86!

Seth Brown:

Ah! think about a laptop with an ARM CPU. Imagine how long the battery would last on something that ran on a cellphone CPU. Days probably. My cellphone runs for a week without needing a re-charge.

If the laptop did had a solid state disk, and the low power screen, with an ARM CPU and a Linux OS tweaked to extend battery usage, think of walking around without a charger for days on end.

And low cost, why not? Why does every new technology have to cost an arm and a leg when it comes out?

David Manners:

I couldn't agree more

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on January 17, 2008 7:03 AM.

The previous post in this blog was The Dutch TV Repairman And The VC..

The next post in this blog is How Wrong Can You Be?.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Sign up for the new weekly Mannerisms eNewsletter. Get the latest posts straight to your email inbox, no fuss. Tick the option for Semiconductor commentary.

RSS Subscribe to this blog's feed
[What is this?]

Archives

Go back to ElectronicsWeekly.com