Back in 1997, Intel was clearly getting frustrated at the lack of progress by the telecommunications industry in delivering high-speed networks.
"Where I live you require the patience of Job if you want ISDN. My local telephone company views ISDN as a bad dream which it wishes would go away, " said Andy Grove, in February 1997 in
"The computer industry does its stuff delivering increased performance and reducing prices because it's a competitive and open industry with hundreds of companies in it" expanded Grove, "but the telecommunications industry has a government monopoly legacy which is not used to delivering its services in a competitive economy. We need improving bandwidth and declining prices and neither trend is being served sufficiently."
"Our basic premise is that all computing is networked computing" asserted Grove. Ho
Grove saw some bright spots: "Deutsche Telekom is doing a magnificent job deploying ISDN" enthused Grove "in
He is also envious of
So the telecoms industry can do its stuff when it wants to but it does it erratically spasmodically and on an irrationally localised basis.
"Technically there's nothing on the way to move us to higher bandwidth better than ISDN" said Grove, who included in the term ISDN all the XDSL technologies - ADSL HDSL etc.
"I'd love to believe ISDN can be deployed very rapidly but it's moving at a speed that seems very slow to the computer industry" bemoaned Grove adding "the sooner we manage to move the telecommunications industry into a more competitive world the better off we'd be in all these things."
Asked if he was promoting networked computing just because it helped sell more microprocessors Grove responded: "I get paid to serve Intel's interest but I don't get paid enough to lie. It's clearly in our enlightened business interest that consumers' eyeballs move over to the PC from the TV but we actually believe this stuff. It may only be a skip and a jump from you saying 'there's Grove giving a marketing message' but I believe the message to be true. We walk the talk as well as talk the talk."
Asked if his focus on network computing was the result of the much-hyped concept of the 'Network Computer (NC)' publicised by Larry Ellison of Oracle Grove denied that the network computer was driving a new way of using computers. Quite the reverse. "The sun doesn't rise because the rooster crows" he responded, pointing out that network computing was happening because a couple of hundred million people around the world now had computers technically capable of accessing the communications networks.
He demonstrated how consumers could use networked PC technology to cut out the retail middle-man and order manufactured goods - sometimes customised to their particular requirements - direct from the companies which made them.
However Grove warned that

Andy didn't seem to realise that comms processing takes a lot more horsepower than running Word for Windows. In 1997 when I was at Westell trying to get ADSL rolled out the semi industy wanted US$120 for the DSP capability required to move 2Mbps across a phone line using ADSL so it's no wonder it took a while to take off. Actually I think the comms industry has done a good job of using the processing power available from the prevailing semiconductor state of the art fairly well ever since the mid 90s. Ideas are developed using multi-chip solutions but it's only once we get to single chip Bluetooth/Wi-fi/ADSL/whatever's next that it takes off.