Welcome again to the wonderful but sometimes weird world of wireless comms, written by Joel Young, CTO of Digi International.In the last post I teased you by first stating that the traditional transverse electromagnetic wave method, i.e. how the sun works, doesn't scale very well for more moderate systems on the earth and second, telling you that Nikola Tesla had figured out a better way.
Unfortunately I didn't give you any details. However, before we get into too many details, we need to understand a few things about waves and the need to guide them.
For without the ability to carefully control and direct a wave, they tend to spread out in all directions. And of course, when the spread out, not only does the energy density decrease, but they also have a nasty habit of running into things which both scatter and absorb them.
Hence we have a problem - we want to send power wirelessly so we don't need to worry about plugs and cables, but this means that we need to have the energy be distributed over a wide area because we don't know exactly where we need the power.
The act of spreading typical transverse waves everywhere means that it is really hard to capture much of it unless we have a sun-sized source. It seems we have a paradox.
They key to this puzzle is to think about the problem differently - something very difficult for most of the engineers in Tesla's time and difficult for many even today. To understand the notion of wireless power, we first must return to the world of wire-line power in Tesla's time. Tesla pushed AC and Edison pushed DC.
Most of us know that DC doesn't work over long distance because of Ohm's Law. Wires, even big transmission lines have a natural resistance. Hence, all DC transmissions are subject to Ohm's law - meaning that the longer the line, the higher the resistance and the larger the voltage drop. A lot of power gets wasted in the transmission process.
In contrast, sending an AC signal down a line means that the potential is constantly changing - the electrons "slosh" back and forth, sending a wave down the line and the resistance in the line is bounded by the "sloshing." The laws of Physics and Ohm's law still apply, but the effects are mitigated. Now for the sake of discussion, I want you to think about the wire for AC as a sort of guide or tunnel for the 50/60 Hz wave.
In electromagnetics, we have something called near field and far field effects. Far field effects are concerned with the sending and receiving of traditional, transverse waves like we have previously discussed. Near field deals with the interaction of circuits and elements that are very close together.
A transformer is a near field type of device where two coils are coupled electromagnetically. With a transformer, electric energy is transferred from one coil of wire to the other by means of induction. This happens because a changing current induces a changing magnetic field and a changing magnetic field induces a current.
For this to work efficiently, the coils of wire that have the currents must be very close together. You may have seen some battery chargers that don't appear to have any terminals for connection - like an electric toothbrush. These use induction for charging. So what if we could extend these near field effects over a distance?
To understand how we might transmit wireless power, we begin with Figure 1 (see below). This illustrates the concept of a single wire transmission system by coupling two Tesla coils together. Power goes into the coil on the left and is inductively transferred to the big coil, creating a high frequency AC power.
The same power then is transferred back to the coil on the other end to a load. In the wire, the electrons slosh around, back and forth such that the electric field difference is from wire to wire while the energy flows through magnetic field outside the coil. The sloshing electrons look like a compression wave down the coil.
Next in Figure 2, we split the large coil in the middle and insert a coaxial cable. The compression wave of sloshing electrons moves down the cable and the magnetic field is guided along the cable's dielectric so that it doesn't spread out over free space and lose density.
Finally in Figure 3 we replace the coaxial cable by the Earth and let the atmosphere act as the dielectric.
One hundred years ago, Tesla proved this system works by sending power wirelessly over 25 miles and lighting hundreds of lamps. Wireless power works and the laws of physics have not been violated.
Unfortunately, if you can just plug into the ground, there is no place to put the electric meter.
Hence we have a problem - we want to send power wirelessly so we don't need to worry about plugs and cables, but this means that we need to have the energy be distributed over a wide area because we don't know exactly where we need the power.
The act of spreading typical transverse waves everywhere means that it is really hard to capture much of it unless we have a sun-sized source. It seems we have a paradox.
They key to this puzzle is to think about the problem differently - something very difficult for most of the engineers in Tesla's time and difficult for many even today. To understand the notion of wireless power, we first must return to the world of wire-line power in Tesla's time. Tesla pushed AC and Edison pushed DC.
Most of us know that DC doesn't work over long distance because of Ohm's Law. Wires, even big transmission lines have a natural resistance. Hence, all DC transmissions are subject to Ohm's law - meaning that the longer the line, the higher the resistance and the larger the voltage drop. A lot of power gets wasted in the transmission process.
In contrast, sending an AC signal down a line means that the potential is constantly changing - the electrons "slosh" back and forth, sending a wave down the line and the resistance in the line is bounded by the "sloshing." The laws of Physics and Ohm's law still apply, but the effects are mitigated. Now for the sake of discussion, I want you to think about the wire for AC as a sort of guide or tunnel for the 50/60 Hz wave.
In electromagnetics, we have something called near field and far field effects. Far field effects are concerned with the sending and receiving of traditional, transverse waves like we have previously discussed. Near field deals with the interaction of circuits and elements that are very close together.
A transformer is a near field type of device where two coils are coupled electromagnetically. With a transformer, electric energy is transferred from one coil of wire to the other by means of induction. This happens because a changing current induces a changing magnetic field and a changing magnetic field induces a current.
For this to work efficiently, the coils of wire that have the currents must be very close together. You may have seen some battery chargers that don't appear to have any terminals for connection - like an electric toothbrush. These use induction for charging. So what if we could extend these near field effects over a distance?
To understand how we might transmit wireless power, we begin with Figure 1 (see below). This illustrates the concept of a single wire transmission system by coupling two Tesla coils together. Power goes into the coil on the left and is inductively transferred to the big coil, creating a high frequency AC power.
The same power then is transferred back to the coil on the other end to a load. In the wire, the electrons slosh around, back and forth such that the electric field difference is from wire to wire while the energy flows through magnetic field outside the coil. The sloshing electrons look like a compression wave down the coil.
Next in Figure 2, we split the large coil in the middle and insert a coaxial cable. The compression wave of sloshing electrons moves down the cable and the magnetic field is guided along the cable's dielectric so that it doesn't spread out over free space and lose density.Finally in Figure 3 we replace the coaxial cable by the Earth and let the atmosphere act as the dielectric.
One hundred years ago, Tesla proved this system works by sending power wirelessly over 25 miles and lighting hundreds of lamps. Wireless power works and the laws of physics have not been violated.
Unfortunately, if you can just plug into the ground, there is no place to put the electric meter.
Previous Weird & Wireless:
- Weird & Wireless: What about wireless power transmission?
- Weird & Wireless: How can light have temperature?
- Weird & Wireless: CFL, LED, and the incandescent bulb
- Weird & Wireless: Differences between lumens, lux, candelas and watts
- Weird & Wireless: "Line of Site" changing closer to the receiver
- Weird & Wireless: Passive antennas and gain
- Weird & Wireless: What happens when an RF hits an obstacle?
- Weird & Wireless: RF "Line of Sight"
- Weird & Wireless: Signals getting weaker in free space
- Weird & Wireless: Why don't wireless transmissions go on forever?
- Weird & Wireless: Adding wind power to your home
- Weird & Wireless: Why do mobile phones cause noise on my office speaker phone?
- Weird & Wireless: Does unplugging all your wall-warts really matter?
- Weird & Wireless: How did we end up with a kilowatt-hour?
- Weird & Wireless: Why is the use of cell phones discouraged around petrol pumps?
- Weird & Wireless: What is the difference between a human eye and an antenna?
- Weird & Wireless: What's the deal with electronics and radios on airplanes?
- Weird & Wireless: Can batteries be left out in the cold?
- Weird & Wireless: GPS, and how do those satellites know where I am?
- Weird & Wireless: Do microwave ovens cause cancer?
- Weird & Wireless: Why can I use a 2.4-GHz phone and 802.11 network at the same time?
Comments (4)
This:
"sending an AC signal down a line means that the potential is constantly changing - the electrons "slosh" back and forth, sending a wave down the line and the resistance in the line is bounded by the "sloshing." The laws of Physics and Ohm's law still apply, but the effects are mitigated. "
is not at all correct.
AC works better than DC because with AC you can use a transformer to increase the voltage (and thus reduce the current) for transmission of power (voltage times current, if we ignore reactive loads).
The Ohm's Law losses are proportional to the current squared, so by making the voltage high enough you can greatly reduce the current and thus the transmission losses. Transformers are very efficient.
For very long transmission lines (hundreds or thousands of miles), AC has disadvantages. There is radiation loss (very low frequency radio, 60Hz!), and there are complications when joining two regions of the country that have other connections too, or their own power generators--one must match the phases or excessive power will flow and damage things.
For this reason, some long transmission lines convert AC to very high voltage DC for transmission, and back to AC again at the other end. This eliminates the radiation loss and the phase matching problem, but the conversion between AC and DC is very expensive at high voltages and high power levels, because you can't use transformers with DC.
Posted by David Gustavson | December 18, 2009 10:13 PM
Posted on December 18, 2009 22:13
AC (rather than DC) does not mitigate resistive losses - you can't avoid Ohm's Law just because it's AC. Rather, the purpose of AC is that it naturally allows itself to be transformed (using a transformer!) to different voltages.
Electricity transmission is at high voltage, because for the same power transfer, the current at high voltage is lower than at low voltage. Resistive losses are I^2 * R, so the lower the current, the better.
AC readily enables high voltage transmission because it can be transformed easily. That's why it's AC and nothing to do with electrons sloshing about. That's nonsense.
Posted by Richard Smith | January 7, 2010 5:44 PM
Posted on January 7, 2010 17:44
I'm afraid that the AC DC comparison for loss isn't the only nonesense in this article.
Magnetic fields are not guided by a dielectric; a dielectric only affects the magnitude of the electro-static (ES) field component of an EM wave (or a static field as in a capacitor). A coaxial cable supports a TEM wave in which the energy is periodically transferred between the ES field and the magnetic field. A dielectric changes the ES field component and lowers the impedance of the coax.
I can't see that Figure 2 introduces the coax - it is the same as Figure 1. How is the coax connected to the coil to launch the TEM wave?
The Tesla coil transfers energy via magnetic (inductive) coupling and acts in a similar way to the core in a transformer, although the circulating current in the coil is subject to Ohmic losses.
Coupling to "free-space" is the same principle used in the ferrite rod antenna popular in AM portable radios - it acts as a transducer to couple to a TEM wave (by setting up an alternating potential difference and an alternating current - hence ES field and magnetic field), which propagates according to an inverse square law for power density (although there is a directional gain from such an antenna - it is not isotropic).
By coupling to a coaxial cable, the TEM wave is constrained from diverging and propagates with only the Ohmic and dielectric losses.
Low-frequency TEM waves in the atmosphere can experience ducting whereby the wave is bent to follow the curvature of the earth. This priciple is exploited in several "over-the-horizon" radars for early-warning systems.
I could pick more holes, but I think this makes the point.
What is the purpose of such a "dumbed-down" article, which is likely only to be read by people who have a far better understanding of the principles than the author appears to have? If they don't, then they will not be educated by this level of explanation.
Posted by Dave Lynam | January 13, 2010 1:38 PM
Posted on January 13, 2010 13:38
look it all happens because of the magical time travelling elfs.
Posted by Darragh | October 9, 2010 6:35 PM
Posted on October 9, 2010 18:35