The best companion to your music collection
Everyone loves valve hi-fi equipment. A fan of mixing the old with the new, Andrew Smith designed a very high performance valve headphone amplifier. Using a unique combination of thermionic and semiconductor technology, the headphone amp runs from a regulated 15V, 1A wall-wart supply for a complete, no-compromise power system. The headphone amp also includes a DC-DC converter providing the required 175V at 15mA for two channels which shuts down gracefully if the output current reaches 38mA, so there’ll be no chance of a burn-up while you’re burning up the dancefloor at home. So now you can take a step back in time a little while listening to everything from Beethoven to Britney.
Headphone Amplifier
View headphone amp circuit schematic
People love valve hi-fi equipment. Somehow the warm glow of the tubes and the nostalgia of past times never fails to enhance our enjoyment of good music; it is something like vintage wine by candlelight. So here is a design for a very high performance valve headphone amplifier which will find its place in any discerning audiophile system.
This amplifier is unorthodox in that it mixes thermionic and semiconductor technology. An EF184 pentode is used to provide voltage gain (x5) and a warm glow, while a Darlington emitter-follower provides a low impedance output. An active emitter load is used to improve linearity. The EF184 is a very low-noise device (it has a much lower equivalent noise resistance than most triodes), with a high and unusually linear transconductance; it is very suitable as an audiophile tube.
The design is capable of driving relatively insensitive headphones with a voltage of 700mV rms and a total harmonic distortion of 0.03% or better. It performs well with my Sennheiser HD25SP and AKG 701 phones, both of which combine low sensitivity with relatively low impedance, so the amplifier is likely to be suitable for most other high quality phones, many of which will be less demanding. On listening tests the amplifier gives the impression of the sonic equivalent of clear, bright spring water - transparent, detailed, refreshing. The only defect in performance that I have noticed is slight microphony from the valves. Some might regard this as an attractive glow-bug characteristic, but in normal use it cannot be heard at all.
The amplifier runs from a regulated 15v, 1A 'wall-wart' supply, and includes a dc-dc converter to provide the required 175v at 15mA (for two channels). The converter uses a Mullard LA1 Ferroxcube transformer core recovered from the junkbox. The converter has high efficiency (~85%), and the transistors run happily without a heatsink: the switching frequency is 25kHz, so no audible noise is contributed from the HT supply. The converter is housed in the same wooden box as the other components. The box is lined internally with self-adhesive copper foil.
Specifications
Output: 700mVrms to 85 Ohms (2.9mW)
Bandwidth: 15Hz – 25kHz @ -3dB
Voltage Gain: 5
THD: <0.03%
Power requirement: 12Vdc @ 800mA (two channels)
Input impedance: 47k Ohms
Output impedance: 10 Ohms
Circuit description
The valve stage has a gain of 5, and includes local cathode-degeneration feedback: there is no overall feedback which might compromise the transient response. The bias point of the EF184 is set by P1, which is adjusted to provide static anode current of 6.5mA: the bias is adjustable in order to allow precise setting of the anode current in relation to the characteristics of individual valves, ageing, etc.
The output stage uses a Darlington follower (T1, T2) with an active current source as emitter load (T3, T4). The dc bias voltage at the emitter of T2 is set to 8.0 volts by P2, while the bias current is set to 100mA by R10. The total dissipation of T2 and T3 is 1.2W, so a small common heatsink must be used. The semiconductors used in the output stage are not at all critical, and other similar components could be used, for example an IRL540 would be suitable for T3.
The valve heaters are connected in series to the nominal 12v supply. Ideally this should be 12.6v, which can be achieved by connecting a silicon diode in series with the common connection of a 7812 regulator chip.
A spectrum is shown below with the amplifier driving 1vpk into the Sennheiser phones (a very loud signal). Second and 3rd harmonic spikes are at the -83dB level, corresponding to about 0.01% THD; 10dB below the specification level.
This level of distortion can only be attained if the bias points of the valves are adjusted under test, but setting the bias current to 6.5mA will be a close approximation to the optimum condition. The setting of the static output voltage (P2) and the exact value of R9 also influence the linearity of the amplifier, so these can also be tweaked. Valve-orientated audiophiles might be interested to note that the amplifier can be set up to provide about 1 per cent 2nd harmonic distortion, should that type of performance be required.
Power system
The amplifier has two on-board 7812 regulators. One, fitted with a diode in the common lead, supplies 12.6v to the heaters and the output stage; the other supplies 12v to the inverter. The system is powered from an off-board 15v supply which is also regulated. This might appear to be over-kill, but the result is a completely no-compromise power system. Using a separate local regulator for the inverter is a very good way of ensuring that the on-board inverter does not cause any electromagnetic compatibility problems to other equipment.
170v DC/DC Inverter. This is a conventional saturating-core converter using a LA1 ferroxcube core. The efficiency of this converter is around 80%, depending on load conditions. The converter stops oscillating and shuts down gracefully if the output current reaches 38mA, so there is no chance of a burn-up if the circuit is overloaded. P1 can be set to minimum resistance or omitted, but it can be adjusted to optimise efficiency under different load conditions. It is not a critical adjustment.
HT Regulator. When working with an amplifier as good as this, it is difficult not to become obsessive about the fine details. Regulating the HT supply confers two minor benefits on the system, both related to the relatively poor power-supply noise rejection of the valve amplifier. Firstly, regulation improves the channel separation at low frequencies by lowering the output impedance of the HT power supply, and thereby reducing the cross-coupling between channels which occurs through this path. Secondly it reduces the effect of any residual noise on the 12v supply. Since the HT inverter acts as a transformer with a step up ratio of 14, noise on the 12v line can become surprisingly noticeable unless the 12v regulator is particularly effective. However, both considerations are of minor importance, so this section is strictly for the purists.
The HT regulator uses a GD150M/S gas discharge regulator which adds a third tube to the glassware on display. The current in the regulator tube is set to 5mA by the constant current circuit connected in its anode: this uses a high voltage P-channel FET (T1, IRF9610). Sadly, the mysterious purple glow which these tubes produce is not very evident at this current level.
Two high-voltage transistors - T3, T4, both 2SC2688 are used in a Darlington follower circuit to reduce the output impedance. Although there is no short-circuit protection, the limited current capability of the converter makes this circuit safe against accidents.
Power dissipation in T4 is in the region of 400mW in normal operation, higher during short-circuit conditions, so a heatsink is advisable. D1 is not used as a voltage reference - its function is to protect T1 from excessive gate-source voltage due to any accidental malfunction. The choice of device for T2 is not critical: any small PNP transistor can be used.
RS Parts list - Amplifier (One channel)
| Quantity | RS Part # | Part description |
| 4 | 193-6758 | 470uF, 16V Capacitor |
| 1 | 228-6644 | 47uF, 16V Capacitor |
| 1 | 547-8436 | 10uF, 16V Capacitor |
| 1 | 365-4666 | 10uF, 250V Capacitor |
| 1 | 117-757 | 220nF, 250V Capacitor |
| 1 | 653-0226 | 100nF, 50V Capacitor |
| 1 | 118-909A | 470pF, 250V Capacitor |
| 1 | 164-558 | 180k 0.25W Resistor |
| 1 | 148-938 | 68k 0.25W Resistor |
| 1 | 148-792A | 18k 0.25W Resistor |
| 1 | 148-736A | 10k 0.25W Resistor |
| 1 | 214-1276 | 10k 1W Resistor |
| 1 | 144-330A | 5.6k 0.25W Resistor |
| 1 | 144-324 | 4.7k 0.25W Resistor |
| 1 | 144-245 | 1k 0.25W Resistor |
| 1 | 144-217A | 560 ohm 0.25W Resistor |
| 1 | 144-201 | 470 ohm 0.25W Resistor |
| 1 | 477-7524 | 5.6 ohm 0.25W Resistor |
| 1 | 168-336 | 47k dual log pot |
| 1 | 522-1117 | 4.7k preset pot |
| 1 | 652-4265 | 10k preset pot |
| 2 | 293-533 | BC108 bipolar |
| 1 | 311-962A | BD131 bipolar |
| 1 | 395-8659 | IRL3303 FET |
| 1 | 500-6463 | B9a Valveholder |
Regulator
| Quantity | RS Part # | Part description |
| 1 | 467-9256 | 1uF 250V Capacitor |
| 1 | 115-146 | 0.68uF 250V Capacitor |
| 1 | 132-977 | 100k 0.25W Resistor |
| 1 | 135-780A | 120 ohm 0.25W Resistor |
| 1 | 812-421 | 6.8v zener diode |
| 1 | 395-5278 | IRF 9610 FET |
| 2 | 2SC2688 bipolar | |
| 1 | 2SB644 bipolar | |
| 1 | GD 150M/S gas tube | |
| 1 | B7G Valveholder |
Converter
| Quantity | RS Part # | Part description |
| 2 | 122-3490 | 1000uF 16v Capacitor |
| 2 | 365-4650 | 4.7uF 250V Capacitor |
| 1 | 176-8230 | 1uF 16v Capacitor |
| 1 | 135-910A | 10k 0.25W resistor |
| 1 | 136-042A | 470k 0.25W resistor |
| 1 | 652-4546 | 1k preset pot |
| 7 | 348-5432 | 1N4937 diode |
| 1 | 288-137 | Common Mode Choke |
| 1 | 228-157 | 18uH inductor |
| 2 | 2SD1266A biplar | |
| 1 | LA1 Ferrite Core |

Comments (2)
Sir,
Very interesting circuit and I note your points about microphony with an EF184 or as it says on the circuit an EF80. I'd recommend the Brimar 6BR7 as a much better audio tube as it was designed as competition for the Mullard EF86. you're lucky as the pin out equals the EF80/184 [which an EF86 does not]
I an intrigued as to why you have used the pentode as a pentode and not connected as a triode, altogether better as a voltage amp at low gain requirements, less noise and more linear! I look forward to your reply.
Dave P G4OYX
Posted by David Porter | March 20, 2008 4:33 PM
Posted on March 20, 2008 16:33
Thanks for the comment Dave. The thing about this amplifier that really pleased me was its immaculate objective performance in two respects – noise and harmonic distortion. Performance in these areas is faultless, as can be judged from the spectrum shown on my website –
http://g4oep.atspace.com/efamp/efamp.htm
At 1vRMS measured harmonic spurs are at the –85dB level while broad band noise is at the –100dB level. This performance far exceeds that quoted for most high-end audiophile products. The apparent rise in noise at low frequencies is in part an artefact of the sound card used during measurement.
If anyone wants to replicate this performance it is imperative that the specified valves are used (EF80, or, preferably, EF184), and that they are biased in the specified way. It is possible that, with modifications, a similar circuit could produce comparable results with a different valve, but that is a question of measurement rather than armchair philosophising. Simply replacing the EF184 with a 6BR7 in this circuit is a recipe for disaster!
As regards the merits of the 6BR7, it should be appreciated that this tube was intended for application in low-level audio preamps, a significantly different application from the present one. With a signal level of up to 1.5v peak rather than a few mV different considerations apply. Large-signal linearity becomes a dominating requirement, while noise (expressed as a ratio to the main signal) is much less of a concern. Having said that, however, it is worth noting that the EF184 has a lower noise resistance (300 ohms) than most triodes (e.g. 2400 for the 12AT7 – I do not have a figure for the 6BR7), a fact related to its ‘frame grid’ construction and the resulting very high transconductance (15.6mS). In the present application, with dc heater supply and a relatively large signal level, the special anti-hum screening of the 6BR7 is irrelevant.
However, when all is said and done, the proof of the pudding is in the eating, so it would be very interesting to evaluate the 6BR7 in this circuit. Let us know what you find – my distortion-measuring technique is described on my website, and is easy to set up.
Best wishes, Andy G4OEP
Posted by Anonymous | March 28, 2008 8:21 AM
Posted on March 28, 2008 08:21