<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Core Values</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.electronicsweekly.com,2008:/blogs/intellectual-property//66</id>
   <updated>2007-11-14T11:07:49Z</updated>
   <subtitle>A streetwise view of semiconductors and IP from Warren Savage at IPextreme</subtitle>
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Enterprise 1.53</generator>

<entry>
   <title>Warren&apos;s IP column debuts</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/2007/11/warrens-ip-column-debuts.html" />
   <id>tag:www.electronicsweekly.com,2007:/blogs/intellectual-property//66.17467</id>
   
   <published>2007-11-14T11:01:34Z</published>
   <updated>2007-11-14T11:07:49Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Just to tidy things up, Warren Savage&apos;s column on semiconductors and intellectual property has now begun - check out the first instalment &quot;Warren Savage On: Making the Case for Invented Here&quot;</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Alun Williams</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="31019" label="NIH syndrome" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/">
      <![CDATA[Just to tidy things up, Warren Savage's column on semiconductors and intellectual property has now begun - check out the first instalment <a href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/Articles/2007/11/13/42613/warren+savage+on+making+the+case+for+invented+here.htm" title="Warren Savage On: Making the Case for Invented Here"><b>Warren Savage On: Making the Case for Invented Here</b></a>]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Warren&apos;s IP column coming soon...</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/2007/10/warrens-ip-column-coming-soon.html" />
   <id>tag:www.electronicsweekly.com,2007:/blogs/intellectual-property//66.16181</id>
   
   <published>2007-10-22T09:05:52Z</published>
   <updated>2007-10-22T09:05:59Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Please keep an eye out for a new column from Warren, covering the same IP beat, that will be appearing on ElectronicsWeekly.com soon</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Alun Williams</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="28261" label="IP column" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/">
      <![CDATA[[<em>Alun Williams, Web Editor, writes</em>] Please keep an eye out for a new column from Warren, covering the same IP beat, that will be appearing on ElectronicsWeekly.com soon. 

Warren will be presenting essentially the same content, but in a monthly column format, which means the blog will no longer be updated. Thanks to all the readers of these posts - we hope you make the journey with us to the new column!

AW]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Power to the People</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/2007/10/power-to-the-people.html" />
   <id>tag:www.electronicsweekly.com,2007:/blogs/intellectual-property//66.15076</id>
   
   <published>2007-10-01T04:46:37Z</published>
   <updated>2007-10-01T12:51:06Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Last week about 400 people from around the world descended upon Austin, Texas for the first annual Power Architecture Developers Conference. It was a remarkable two days of seeing competitors lay down their weapons to come together for the nerd equivalent of the Summer of Love.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Warren Savage</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="26132" label="crowdsourcing" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20221" label="Power Architecture" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="26131" label="Power Architecture Developers Conference" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="26134" label="Power.org" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/">
      <![CDATA[Last week about 400 people from around the world descended upon Austin, Texas for the first annual <a href="http://www.power.org/devcon/07/">Power Architecture Developers Conference</a>.  It was a remarkable two days of seeing competitors lay down their weapons to come together for the nerd equivalent of the Summer of Love.

<img alt="PowerToThePeople.jpg" src="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/PowerToThePeople.jpg" width="200" height="200" />

As I’ve mentioned in this space on several occasions, the future of the semiconductor business will require collaboration and healthy ecosystems.  I participated in two panels.

]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>It&apos;s like Déjà vu all over again</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/2007/09/its-like-deja-vu-all-over-agai.html" />
   <id>tag:www.electronicsweekly.com,2007:/blogs/intellectual-property//66.14332</id>
   
   <published>2007-09-18T05:13:19Z</published>
   <updated>2007-09-27T15:38:26Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Many of my friends in the U.K. and Europe won’t appreciate an American sports legend, Yogi Berra. But Berra was a solid catcher for the New York Yankees during their golden days of the 1950’s. But Yogi is most famous for his “Berra-isms”, his unusual knack for mangling the English language in his own brand of folksy wisdom.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Warren Savage</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="25596" label="déjà vu" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="7292" label="FSA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="25601" label="IIA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="25598" label="OCP-IP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="25599" label="SPIRIT" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="25594" label="standards body" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="25603" label="Yogi Berra" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/">
      Many of my friends in the U.K. and Europe won’t appreciate an American sports legend, Yogi Berra. But Berra was a solid catcher for the New York Yankees during their golden days of the 1950’s. But Yogi is most famous for his “Berra-isms”, his unusual knack for mangling the English language in his own brand of folksy wisdom. Impossible to describe, so here are some examples:

•	“A nickel ain’t worth a dime anymore.” 
•	“You can observe a lot by watching.” 
•	“If the world were perfect, it wouldn’t be.” 
•	“Ninety percent of the game is half mental.”

   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Black Swans on IP Lake</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/2007/09/black-swans-on-ip-lake.html" />
   <id>tag:www.electronicsweekly.com,2007:/blogs/intellectual-property//66.13662</id>
   
   <published>2007-09-03T23:06:43Z</published>
   <updated>2007-10-05T15:43:39Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The debate on the future to the IP market rages on with dozens of Letters to the Editor protesting Mark Lapedus’ controversial opinion piece (Semi IP is a lost Cause) last month.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Warren Savage</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="1112" label="ARM" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="12532" label="Black Swans" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="23067" label="Nassim Nicholas Taleb" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/">
      <![CDATA[The debate on the future to the IP market rages on with dozens of <a href="(http://www.eetimes.com/ipdebate/;jsessionid=CXEWNL5OKSFTAQSNDLOSKH0CJUNN2JVN)">Letters to the Editor </a>protesting Mark Lapedus’ controversial opinion piece (Semi IP is a lost Cause) last month.

I’ve just returned from Japan and had the fortune to pick up a great, thought provoking book called “Black Swan” by Nassim Nicholas Taleb. A Black Swan is defined as a rare event with three very special characteristics: 1) It is not predicted, 2) it has massive consequences usually on a global scale, and 3) in retrospect people invariable claim that they could have predicted it if they had been paying attention. Examples of Black Swans are 9/11, the Netscape IPO, and the stock crash of October 1987.
<img alt="BlackSwan.jpg" src="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/BlackSwan.jpg" width="240" height="240" />


]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Cindarella stood up at the System Verilog Ball</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/2007/08/cindarella-stood-up-at-the-sys.html" />
   <id>tag:www.electronicsweekly.com,2007:/blogs/intellectual-property//66.13189</id>
   
   <published>2007-08-22T02:04:25Z</published>
   <updated>2007-09-04T10:52:53Z</updated>
   
   <summary>As I&apos;ve written in this column before, a key impediment to System Verilog&apos;s application as a IP design language is uniform support across the major EDA players.  Without a consistent set of implemented features and tested interoperability, IP design with System Verilog is too risky.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Warren Savage</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="23063" label="Cadence" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="23059" label="design language" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="23065" label="Mentor" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="23061" label="Open Verification Methodology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="9619" label="Synopsys" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="23057" label="System Verilog" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/">
      <![CDATA[As I've written in this column before, a key impediment to System Verilog's application as a IP design language is uniform support across the major EDA players.  Without a consistent set of implemented features and tested interoperability, IP design with System Verilog is too risky.

A <a href="http://www.eetimes.com/news/design/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201800451">significant step in System Verilog's maturity happened last week </a>with the announcement that Cadence and Mentor have teamed to work together to develop the Open Verification Methodology around System Verilog.  Bravo! With this move, the odds of System Verilog IP working across platform dramatically improve.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>News of our Death Greatly Exaggated</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/2007/08/news-of-our-death-greatly-exaggated.html" />
   <id>tag:www.electronicsweekly.com,2007:/blogs/intellectual-property//66.12790</id>
   
   <published>2007-08-13T05:31:50Z</published>
   <updated>2007-08-13T11:36:32Z</updated>
   
   <summary>On behalf of the IP industry, I’m happy to paraphrase Mark Twain in that the news of our death as been greatly exaggerated.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Warren Savage</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="10117" label="45nm" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20245" label="internal IP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="16374" label="iPhone" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20905" label="Moore’s Law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20903" label="non-profit business" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/">
      <![CDATA[On behalf of the IP industry, I’m happy to paraphrase Mark Twain in that the news of our death as been greatly exaggerated.

Mark LaPedus of EETimes last week made a few provocative statements in his column last week <a href="http://www.eetimes.com/showArticle.jhtml;jsessionid=EKAYYS04M3GEQQSNDLOSKHSCJUNN2JVN?articleID=201202521">Semi IP Sector is a Lost Cause</a> calling the semiconductor IP sector a “non-profit business” and posted a follow-up challenge to companies to challenge his conclusion <a href="http://www.eetimes.com/news/design/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=201400098">Letter to Semi IP vendors</a> adding that it would be probably a better use of his time to improve his golf game than to write about the IP market.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>VSIA goes out with a whimper</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/2007/07/vsia-goes-out-with-a-whimper.html" />
   <id>tag:www.electronicsweekly.com,2007:/blogs/intellectual-property//66.12217</id>
   
   <published>2007-07-27T05:10:53Z</published>
   <updated>2007-08-04T13:20:24Z</updated>
   
   <summary>operations. In the article Electronics standards group VSIA to close, many of the initiatives incubated by the VSIA are now looking for homes in other standards organizations like IEEE and The Spirit Consortium. It’s a sad, closing chapter to a well-intentioned concept that never found a constituency.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Warren Savage</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="14006" label="dotcom" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20208" label="IEEE" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="4404" label="semiconductor" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20210" label="The Spirit Consortium" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20206" label="Virtual Socket Industry Alliance" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/">
      <![CDATA[The Virtual Socket Industry Alliance (VSIA) announced on July 10 that it was closing operations. In the article <a href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/Articles/2007/07/10/41778/electronics+standards+group+vsia+to+close.htm"><em>Electronics standards group VSIA to close</em>, </a>many of the initiatives incubated by the VSIA are now looking for homes in other standards organizations like IEEE and The Spirit Consortium. It’s a sad, closing chapter to a well-intentioned concept that never found a constituency.
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Partners, Partners, Everywhere</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/2007/07/partners-partners-everywhere.html" />
   <id>tag:www.electronicsweekly.com,2007:/blogs/intellectual-property//66.11493</id>
   
   <published>2007-07-11T05:41:07Z</published>
   <updated>2007-08-04T13:24:06Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Look at any company’s web site and it’s likely you’ll see a “Partner” section. It seems that everybody has partners, and the more the better. Thinking about this today, for some reason an old Barry Manilow jingle for Dr. Pepper got stuck in my head.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Warren Savage</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="3901" label="design" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20212" label="Dr. Pepper" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="2001" label="EDA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20214" label="embedded software" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="11363" label="partners" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="4404" label="semiconductor" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/">
      <![CDATA[Look at any company’s web site and it’s likely you’ll see a “Partner” section. It seems that everybody has partners, and the more the better. Thinking about this today, for some reason an old Barry Manilow jingle for Dr. Pepper got stuck in my head.

<em>I’m a partner
You’re a partner
He’s a partner
She’s a partner
Wouldn’t you like to be a partner too?</em>
]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Ecosystems are Essential</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/2007/07/ecosystems-are-essential.html" />
   <id>tag:www.electronicsweekly.com,2007:/blogs/intellectual-property//66.11017</id>
   
   <published>2007-07-02T04:40:27Z</published>
   <updated>2007-08-04T13:26:26Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Allow me a few moments to go green.  Green is everywhere these days, from political parties to E85-compatible cars to new start up companies looking for the next big thing. As Al Gore put to us in “Inconvenient Truth&quot; the planet Earth is an incredible machine composed of a vast number of systems that work together. Working properly, it is a miracle to behold. Perturbed, it can get a little cranky. It is also a system that has a huge capacity to adapt to stress, and the current worry on many people’s minds are whether industrialization is stressing the planet’s ecosystems beyond its natural capacity.  Good question, but not one for discussion here.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Warren Savage</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="20215" label="E85" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20222" label="ecosystem" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20219" label="Freescale Technology Forum" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="2210" label="green" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20217" label="Inconvenient Truth" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20221" label="Power Architecture" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/">
      Allow me a few moments to go green.  Green is everywhere these days, from political parties to E85-compatible cars to new start up companies looking for the next big thing. As Al Gore put to us in “Inconvenient Truth&quot; the planet Earth is an incredible machine composed of a vast number of systems that work together. Working properly, it is a miracle to behold. Perturbed, it can get a little cranky. It is also a system that has a huge capacity to adapt to stress, and the current worry on many people’s minds are whether industrialization is stressing the planet’s ecosystems beyond its natural capacity.  Good question, but not one for discussion here.

   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Help! I&apos;m in PowerPoint Hell</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/2007/06/help-im-in-powerpoint-hell.html" />
   <id>tag:www.electronicsweekly.com,2007:/blogs/intellectual-property//66.10583</id>
   
   <published>2007-06-20T06:03:03Z</published>
   <updated>2007-08-04T13:28:18Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Ever have that feeling that perhaps you&apos;re just a little too familiar with arcane PowerPoint features? Is there a queue of presentations just waiting for you to write? Wonder whether a little nip there, little tuck there, can tweak that tired old presentation into a real winner that will make customers go gaga?</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Warren Savage</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="20226" label="Edward W. Tufte" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="19889" label="marketers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20224" label="PowerPoint" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20227" label="presentations" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/">
      Ever have that feeling that perhaps you&apos;re just a little too familiar with arcane PowerPoint features? Is there a queue of presentations just waiting for you to write? Wonder whether a little nip there, little tuck there, can tweak that tired old presentation into a real winner that will make customers go gaga?

   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Is DAC an IP Show?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/2007/06/is-dac-an-ip-show.html" />
   <id>tag:www.electronicsweekly.com,2007:/blogs/intellectual-property//66.10130</id>
   
   <published>2007-06-09T02:12:27Z</published>
   <updated>2007-08-04T13:32:43Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Is DAC an IP show?  For ten years now, it has been debated whether IP companies should exhibit at this show. It seems the debate has continued this year based on the companies present.

Let&apos;s have a look at 27 IP companies with booths as best as I could locate:</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Warren Savage</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="20229" label="DAC" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="2001" label="EDA" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20152" label="exhibitors" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20233" label="Magma" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20231" label="Rajeev Madhavan" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/">
      Is DAC an IP show?  For ten years now, it has been debated whether IP companies should exhibit at this show. It seems the debate has continued this year based on the companies present.

Let&apos;s have a look at 27 IP companies with booths as best as I could locate:


   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Who Needs Support?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/2007/05/who-needs-support.html" />
   <id>tag:www.electronicsweekly.com,2007:/blogs/intellectual-property//66.9811</id>
   
   <published>2007-05-31T03:26:59Z</published>
   <updated>2007-08-04T13:35:31Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Buying IP support is a little like buying insurance.  If you&apos;re lucky you won&apos;t need it.  If you&apos;re really unlucky, you&apos;ll need a lot and be glad you can get it. IP buyers and sellers often underestimate the level of support that is needed, with perhaps both being a bit biased towards thinking they&apos;re going to draw the lucky card.

From an IP buyer perspective, the characteristics of an IP that doesn&apos;t need much support looks something like this:</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Warren Savage</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="20243" label="complex functions" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20237" label="IP buyers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20235" label="IP support" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="8299" label="memories" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="10574" label="microprocessors" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20241" label="standards IP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="5575" label="survey" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20239" label="value of an IP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/">
      Buying IP support is a little like buying insurance. If you&apos;re lucky you won&apos;t need it.  If you&apos;re really unlucky, you&apos;ll need a lot and be glad you can get it. IP buyers and sellers often underestimate the level of support that is needed, with perhaps both being a bit biased towards thinking they&apos;re going to draw the lucky card.

From an IP buyer perspective, the characteristics of an IP that doesn&apos;t need much support looks something like this:
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Am I Ready to Date?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/2007/05/am-i-ready-to-date.html" />
   <id>tag:www.electronicsweekly.com,2007:/blogs/intellectual-property//66.9459</id>
   
   <published>2007-05-21T04:50:50Z</published>
   <updated>2007-08-04T13:37:31Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Dear Warren,

Perhaps you can help me.  I don&apos;t get out much and I tend to spend a lot of time at work. I feel used and underappreciated by internal groups that only want to get me into their chip. The pattern is always the same. At first, we get together often and talk for hours about how we can work perfectly together. I give them everything, and then, after tape-out, the phone calls stop and they move on.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Warren Savage</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="14167" label="dating" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20248" label="differentiator" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="13247" label="Gartner" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20245" label="internal IP" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20247" label="semiconductor companies" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/">
      <![CDATA[<em>Dear Warren,

Perhaps you can help me.  I don't get out much and I tend to spend a lot of time at work. I feel used and underappreciated by internal groups that only want to get me into their chip. The pattern is always the same. At first, we get together often and talk for hours about how we can work perfectly together. I give them everything, and then, after tape-out, the phone calls stop and they move on.

]]>
   </content>
</entry>
<entry>
   <title>Looking for Mr. Right</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/2007/05/looking-for-mr-right.html" />
   <id>tag:www.electronicsweekly.com,2007:/blogs/intellectual-property//66.9270</id>
   
   <published>2007-05-14T01:26:05Z</published>
   <updated>2007-08-04T13:40:03Z</updated>
   
   <summary>If I were writing a personal ad for someone buying IP, it might look something like this:

Wanted: Long-term relationship with stable and reliable IP. Must provide loving support and be free of bugs or other vermin. Preference given to those with a history of successful relationships and willing to live within small budgets. No flakes.</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Warren Savage</name>
      
   </author>
   
   <category term="20237" label="IP buyers" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="20250" label="IP supplier" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   <category term="10130" label="relationships" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.electronicsweekly.com/blogs/intellectual-property/">
      <![CDATA[If I were writing a personal ad for someone buying IP, it might look something like this:

<em><strong>Wanted:</strong> Long-term relationship with stable and reliable IP. Must provide loving support and be free of bugs or other vermin. Preference given to those with a history of successful relationships and willing to live within small budgets. No flakes.</em>
]]>
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>
