The economic downturn has caused inventory problems in the supply chain, but the scale of those problems is only now becoming visible.
Take Texas Instruments' first quarter results statement. It has taken $132m worth of TI inventory out of the distribution channel.
This is in addition to reducing its own inventory levels by $277m.
These are big numbers by any measure and reflect the pain which the distribution channel must have been suffering in that last six months.
Is the worse behind us?
Well, TI's CEO Rich Templeton thinks it might be, but the road to full recovery is only just beginning.
According to Templeton, TI's inventory reductions are essentially complete, so much so that it even predicts a "moderate" increase in production of new chips in the second quarter.
TI is not alone in cutting inventory levels, Cypress recently reported that Q1 levels were down $13.4m or 15% from Q4.
Fairchild also said last week it had reduced inventory in the distribution channel.
But TI's $400m worth of inventory written off is a big number in anyone's book. Partly due to this TI saw a 97% fall in profits in Q1.
I expect some more gloomy numbers before the Q1 reporting season is over.
But the hope is that will be all the bad stuff out of the way and the chip industry can start to slowly climb off the bottom of this market downturn.


It is a fundamental truth that the Supply Curve lags behind the Demand Curve, usually by the lead time plus a safety margin. Given this it has often puzzled me that in a downturn, companies "write off" inventory in order to improve their "bottom line" reporting rather than holding onto it and using it when the sales rise again. Did this inventory have an expiry date or a "use by" date? In reality, this tactic seems to be purely an accounting exercise and if actual product got thrown away physically, then someone needs to start dumpster diving for this material as the cost is now effectively $0.
Terry, good point. I always assumed the "wiritten-off" inventory was recycled ie scrapped, it may of course find its way into the gray market. This again proves your point. It hasn't actually left the supply chain - just changed ownership.