Many of our customers are choosing to conduct pre-compliance EMC testing throughout the design stage.
Here are seven reasons why it's a good idea:
- Pre-compliance testing reduces the risk of failing certification
- Pre-compliance testing allows you to make changes during the design phase based upon real-world test results
- The earlier product deficiencies are identified in the development process, the easier it is to rectify problems
- Fixing problems after compliance testing is much more expensive and time consuming than fixing them during the design stage
- Pre-compliance testing can focus on the areas that you are concerned may cause problems
- Pre-compliance testing concentrates on identifying solutions rather than finding problems
- Pre-compliance testing makes certification a less nail-biting experience
Previous Certification & Test entries:
* And you thought your EMC tests were difficult!
* Regulation of energy efficiency presents new certification challenges
* Why does volcanic ash cause aircraft flights to be cancelled?
* 14 environments with explosive atmospheres
* Electronics in explosive atmospheres - standards stop things going bang!
* A guide to reliability testing, part 3 - Environmental Stress Screening
* A guide to reliability testing, part 2 - HASS
* A guide to reliability testing, part 1 - HALT
* Certification & Test: Flammable atmospheres - A change to the ATEX Standards for zone 2 equipment
* Certification & Test: How to make sure products comply with Noise at Work regulations
* Certification & Test: The impact of the Noise at Work Directive on your designs
* Certification & Test: How am I going to test that?
* Certification & Test: Electrical safety is still important!
* Certification & Test: Why bother with vibration testing?
* Certification & Test: Do I really need earthquake testing?
* Certification & Test: Differences between earthquake and vibration testing?
* Certification & Test: Safety - it's a complex business!
* Certification & Test: What's the point of a Notified Body?
* Certification & Test: The difference between Bluetooth and ZigBee testing?
* Certification & Test: Is above 1GHz the new Wild West?
* Certification & Test: Where have all the ZigBee products come from?

Steve is Managing Director for the EMC and Safety business of TRaC and has been involved in EMC and product approvals for 19 years. In addition to the day to day running of the business, Steve is actively involved in EMC standardisation both in commercial and defence areas. In addition to being the UK Principal expert on EMC standardisation of Industrial, Scientific and Medical (ISM) products he is also the convenor of CISPR/B/WG1 who has the responsibility of writing the International standard, CISPR 11. Steve wrote the CE marking annex to the UK's defence EMC standard as well as being co-convenor of CENELEC TC210/WG9, responsible for writing a guide on approval of military systems with commercial (CE Marking) requirements.
Appointed Test Manager in 2007, following three years as Projects Manager at TRaC, having previously worked as Head of Environmental Testing at another UKAS accredited test house. Over 20 years' experience of modelling, testing and measurement in the structural dynamics and seismic fields.
Chris has worked in electrical safety compliance for over 17 years. Having previously worked for BSI, he joined TRaC in 1996, progressing through a number of testing roles before becoming Safety Product Manager in 2006.
Appointed Commercial Manager - Analysis in November 2009. Prior to joining TRaC, he was the Business Development Manager at Onward Technologies, an engineering services company based in India. Graham has spent over 20 years working in the CAD / CAE domain selling both engineering services and engineering systems.
Leave a comment
What a user pic? Get a Gravatar!