The number of companies contacting me to enquire about Earthquake Testing has increased this year. Although most of the work is related to increased activity at the Nuclear Power Generating sites - such as the developments at Sellafield - I've also seen an increase in the number of enquiries from UK companies supplying overseas.
Earthquake Qualification Testing often causes consternation for the equipment suppliers who may be familiar with Vibration Testing, but often have little or no experience of the Earthquake Testing.
The process, however, is pretty straightforward if you follow these four steps:
- Determine the test specification. This is usually provided by the end customer or Design Authority and typically incorporates or references an International Standard (e.g. IEEE-344). The input spectrum (usually called a Required Response Spectrum), which specifies the frequencies and amplitudes of the shaking, will also be required. This may be site-specific, or a general specification for a geographical region or industry
- Determine the functionality to be tested. The majority of earthquake testing is carried out with the test item functioning. So it's important to determine the operating configurations that need to be demonstrated during the seismic event, which output parameters need to be measured and to determine detailed pass/fail criteria
- Decide if any ageing should be taken into account. Sometimes it's important that the cumulative affect of environmental conditions is taken into account when earthquake testing. For example, if radiation or elevated temperature may affect the functionality and/or structural integrity of the unit, then this ageing must also be taken into account.
- Make sure you generate the proper documentation. Particularly where safety and reliability are concerned, it is important that all records relating to the traceability of the item being tested, the test records and Test/Qualification Report are well documented and include witnessed sign-off and the appropriate accreditation marks.
Previous Certification & Test entries:
* Is UK really sharpening its teeth for CE Marking Enforcement?
* What's the difference between the UL and MET Listed Marks?
* Military environments warrant separate standards?
* Military CE Marking - Let's Work Together
* Why are there so many emissions standards?
* What's the point in CE Marking military equipment?
* Navigating the approvals process for RF enabled medical devices
* Seven Reasons to Conduct Pre-Compliance EMC Testing
* And you thought your EMC tests were difficult!
* Regulation of energy efficiency presents new certification challenges
* Why does volcanic ash cause aircraft flights to be cancelled?
* 14 environments with explosive atmospheres
* Electronics in explosive atmospheres - standards stop things going bang!
* A guide to reliability testing, part 3 - Environmental Stress Screening
* A guide to reliability testing, part 2 - HASS
* A guide to reliability testing, part 1 - HALT
* Certification & Test: Flammable atmospheres - A change to the ATEX Standards for zone 2 equipment
* Certification & Test: How to make sure products comply with Noise at Work regulations
* Certification & Test: The impact of the Noise at Work Directive on your designs
* Certification & Test: How am I going to test that?
* Certification & Test: Electrical safety is still important!
* Certification & Test: Why bother with vibration testing?
* Certification & Test: Do I really need earthquake testing?
* Certification & Test: Differences between earthquake and vibration testing?
* Certification & Test: Safety - it's a complex business!
* Certification & Test: What's the point of a Notified Body?
* Certification & Test: The difference between Bluetooth and ZigBee testing?
* Certification & Test: Is above 1GHz the new Wild West?
* Certification & Test: Where have all the ZigBee products come from?

Steve is Managing Director for the EMC and Safety business of TRaC and has been involved in EMC and product approvals for 19 years. In addition to the day to day running of the business, Steve is actively involved in EMC standardisation both in commercial and defence areas. In addition to being the UK Principal expert on EMC standardisation of Industrial, Scientific and Medical (ISM) products he is also the convenor of CISPR/B/WG1 who has the responsibility of writing the International standard, CISPR 11. Steve wrote the CE marking annex to the UK's defence EMC standard as well as being co-convenor of CENELEC TC210/WG9, responsible for writing a guide on approval of military systems with commercial (CE Marking) requirements.
Appointed Test Manager in 2007, following three years as Projects Manager at TRaC, having previously worked as Head of Environmental Testing at another UKAS accredited test house. Over 20 years' experience of modelling, testing and measurement in the structural dynamics and seismic fields.
Chris has worked in electrical safety compliance for over 17 years. Having previously worked for BSI, he joined TRaC in 1996, progressing through a number of testing roles before becoming Safety Product Manager in 2006.
Appointed Commercial Manager - Analysis in November 2009. Prior to joining TRaC, he was the Business Development Manager at Onward Technologies, an engineering services company based in India. Graham has spent over 20 years working in the CAD / CAE domain selling both engineering services and engineering systems.
Leave a comment
What a user pic? Get a Gravatar!