Valley View: Simple Guide for a wireless standard

Richard Irving, a partner at venture capital firm Pond Venture Partners says multiple wireless standards will co-exist and in some places wireless will fail to deliver

richardirving%20pond.jpg

People have argued for years over what will be the killer standard for voice, data, and video: one all-powerful standard, always available wherever you are (even on a plane), huge bandwidth, low cost. This debate still rages in Silicon Valley, with the inevitable crop of start-ups making impossible claims.

Perhaps more amazing, some sources of venture capital seem willing to believe them. Those of us with even cursory exposure to communications theory realise that behind hype-laden headlines there are always trade-offs. For example, multipath means lower bit rates when you're moving faster through a given topology.

Other rules are even more obvious: the wider the coverage area the more infrastructure you need for good coverage, and therefore the longer it takes to roll out. Bluetooth took off quickly as it is very short-haul only. WiMAX as at the other end of the scale, so it has taken longer.

I feel a set of simple guidelines may be useful. These will be controversial with some, but my rule would be to consider business, timeline and technical issues together, not just what is scientifically possible. Here are some candidate rules:

Robust, field-proven mobile standards like WCDMA (and later LTE) are best for voice and are only compatible with data if data rates are fairly low.

Mobile video needs broadcast for long-form content - other links are only efficient for small clips.

WiMAX will likely become the best medium for data payloads in the WAN. People are losing enthusiasm for broad WiFi rollouts, and Mesh WiFi is too complex.

Wireless will not work for low-latency, consumer quality video around the home, so to avoid running new wires, you'll have to use existing wires, not rely on wireless. This debate seems resolved here in the Valley, with even inventors of key WiFi technologies in agreement.

So my prediction is that multiple wireless standards will co-exist, and in some places wireless will never fulfill its promise. Remembering this could save us as consumers, employees or investors from making costly mistakes.

No TrackBacks

TrackBack URL: http://www.electronicsweekly.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/12842

Leave a comment

Author Profile

Nick Flaherty
Nick has been covering technology and startups since 1990 and is based in Bristol, where he co-founded the SiliconSouthWest network. During that time he has worked for most of the electronics magazines and newspapers in the UK and several in Europe and the US, covering all areas of the industry. He blogs at The Embedded blog and Portable Multimedia and at www.flaherty.co.uk.

Archives

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Alun Williams - Electronics Weekly.com published on October 9, 2007 10:28 AM.

Funding Icera was the previous entry in this blog.

Missing in action is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.