Analysis: Safety and the lithium battery
Min Xu, Technical Marketing Engineer at Monolithic Power Systems, discusses some of the most common battery-charging faults that pose safety issues to both the device and to the end users.
Lithium batteries – such as lithium ion (Li+), lithium-iron phosphate (LiFePO4), and lithium polymer (LiPo) – have gained greater market traction in portable battery-powered devices thanks to their greater energy densities, larger number of charging cycles, and lower energy dissipation rate than other common rechargeable battery technologies, including nickel-metal hydride (NiMH) and nickel cadmium (NiCd).
However, the technology poses significant challenges to electronics designers. One issue stems from a lack of substantive standardization across lithium battery designs.
Another issue stems from lithium-based technologies requiring more-precise charging than older rechargeable battery technologies.
The biggest concern for electronics designers are the safety risks associated with lithium batteries because they are more likely than NiMH or NiCd batteries to leak, catch fire, or explode, if improperly charged.
This article discusses some of the most common battery-charging faults that pose safety issues to both the device and to the end users.
Common Charging Faults
Many charging faults can damage either the battery or the devices by allowing voltage or current levels to reach inappropriate levels that either can thermally or electrically damage semiconductors, or compromise the battery’s chemical stability. The following table summarizes these common faults, their causes, describes the type of damage they cause to either the device or the battery.
Table 1: List of Common Charging Faults
Figure 1: A Common Charging Circuit without Fault Protections (Simplified)
Many of these faults stem from charging circuits that have direct paths from the adapter to the charging IC, battery, and system. Figure 1 shows a circuit with the aforementioned direct paths: the charger directly connects to the adapter, the system directly connects to the adapter when switch S1 closes, and the battery directly connects to the adapter if S1 and S2 close at the same time.
There are solutions to the faults described in Table 1. The following describes these solutions in details.
Resolving input over-voltage involves an external protection circuit that with an input over-voltage protection (INOVP) threshold. If the adapter input voltage exceeds this threshold, the protection circuit blocks the voltage to the charging system for at some period called the immunity time to block voltage surges. If the adapter input voltage remains above the threshold beyond the immunity time, the protection circuit blocks the input under the assumption that the circuit is connected to an adapter with an incorrect voltage rating.
An output over-current condition can occur randomly. As a result, any over-current protection (OCP) circuit must constantly monitor the adapter current for current levels using a control method similar to INOVP: if the current level rises above the over-current threshold, latch-off the current. However, if the current only experiences a momentary spike, then keeping the current latched off unnecessarily disables the adapter. Therefore, if the protection circuit cycles between allowing the adapter retry and then checking if the current continues to exceed the over-current threshold, then a minor current issue can resolve itself while limiting system, battery, and charger damage. Often, a protection circuit will allow for a certain number of retries before latching off completely.
Battery over-voltage protection (BOVP) requires monitoring the battery voltage directly, and disconnecting the power source when the battery voltage exceeds some threshold. Similar to OCP, BOVP allows the voltage to resume after some latch-off period to determine if a voltage spike triggered the BOVP, or if some regulator has malfunctioned the device latches off after a certain number of retries.
Input Reverse Polarity
Add a diode or a MOSFET between the adapter and the rest of the system (preferably before any protection IC) to prevent a reverse current.
Add a diode between the charger and the battery to prevent any reverse leakage.
Implementing solutions for either input reverse polarity or reverse leakage involves little more than adding a diode or a MOSFET as appropriate. However, implementing INOVP, OCP, or BOVP requires adding circuits that actively monitor and rectify a particular fault: The most cost-effective and compact solutions use charger protection ICs and inserting them between the adapter and the rest of the system.
Figure 2: Charger System with Protection IC
Monolithic Power Systems (MPS)’s MP267x family of charger protectors integrate INOVP, OCP, and BOVP into single ICs, and provide binary counters for both OCP and BOVP to latch off the current or voltage to the charging system after 16 retries. The following plots show the MP2674’s response to INOVP, OCP, and BOVP.
By Min Xu, Technical Marketing Engine er, Monolithic Power Systems.